Research and Development Group |
Link to Forensic Nursing Resource Homepage
EDITORIAL
Edited by: Dr. David Robinson, Rampton Hospital
Mr. Norman McClelland, University of Birmingham and Reaside Clinic
Nurses working in forensic mental health care now have the support of a national
group which aims to promote and establish a body of knowledge to inform practice. The
National Forensic Nurses Research and Development Group was officially launched at the
Forensic Psychiatric Nurses Association Conference in collaboration with the journal of
Psychiatric Care and The Royal College of Nursing in October 1996.
The National Forensic Nurses Research and Development Group are now at a stage where
communication of our meetings and work is essential if we are to promote R & D
activity throughout the forensic community. It is with great pleasure that we send out
some initial information of programmes currently being developed throughout the UK along
with information regarding the current status and future group activities.
Background and aims of the R & D group
In 1991, nurses working in research in the three English special hospitals (Ashworth,
Broadmoor and Rampton) and the State Hospital, Carstairs, Scotland, set up a national
research and development forum. Supported by the Special Hospitals Service Authority
(SHSA), the forum was a sub-group of the SHSA's professional development group. the forum
aimed to:
The forum successfully launched a regular networking newsletter and facilitated two
conferences on innovations in forensic services. The forum's main activities were directed
to promoting research and related issues.
Establishing a new group
The SHSA ceased to exist in March 1996, but before it did members of the forum made a
commitment to set up a new, independent group which would represent all branches of
forensic nursing nationally.
A seminar to discuss some of the issues in shaping a new national group was convened.
A small group met in advance to agree some key principles for discussion, including:
People invited to the seminar included:
Issues discussed included:
The National Forensic Nurses Research and Development Group was officially launched at
the end of October 1996. The group already has 13 members drawn from a wide range of
clinical experience and research activity. There are representatives from high, medium and
low security provision, psychiatric intensive care units and community settings. The group
has strong links with universities and academic programmes, and three members have PhDs.
The objectives of the group are of particular relevance to nurses and other staff in
generic and specialist settings who work with clients whose mental health problems result
in disturbed or offending behaviour.
Objectives
1. Identify contacts in all forensic and related services for purpose of two way
communication:
(b) Internationally
2. Identify and promote current research and good practice
3. Establish channels of dissemination and communication through:
(b) NHS Centre for Dissemination (York)
(c) Network for Psychiatric Nursing Research (Martin Ward)
Current activities
We are currently finalising a directory of all forensic and related units in order to
establish links and develop two way communications in relation to R & D activities.
Link people already showing interest in networking activities will be further developed
through the forensic community. We do not intend to exclude any other relevant areas such
as for example, prison services, community or universities and will develop these contacts
over time.
Dissemination of forensic R & D activities through collaborative networking offers
some exciting opportunities for sharing ideas and initiatives and promoting research and
related activities. We are currently exploring a number of ways in which to identify R
& D activities and disseminate. Here we have editorial representation on the group
from the journal of Psychiatric Care to encourage publication of articles. A
forensic supplement to the Nursing Standard is currently under negotiation and
direct links to the York Centre for Reviews and Dissemination through either a forensic
database or Internet are being discussed.
The next meeting will examine how the group is moving towards its objectives and
establish progress developing new priorities as appropriate. Members of the group are in
the progress of task allocation to ensure each member has a clear and defined role
contributing to a clear co-operate direction. We hope that this with regional links will
be established early in the new year with dissemination taking place shortly after.
We hope that you will contribute towards future editions of newsletters and send details of R & D projects to share with colleagues working within similar settings. A detailed membership director of the group can be found at the end of this newsletter.
Newsletter Aims:
PATIENTS' PERSPECTIVES OF SELF-HARM IN A MEDIUM SECURE UNIT
Many patients in forensic settings have histories of self-harming behaviours, sometimes
resulting in serious injury or death (1,2,3). This abstract concerns the early stages of a
study of patients' experiences of Self-Harm in a medium secure unit (Arnold Lodge.)
AIMS OF THE RESEARCH
The main aims of the research are to:
1 Understand patients' perspectives, in relation to:
2 Study the language used by patients with reference to incidents of Self-Harm.
3 Use the findings as a basis for recommendations about the care of Arnold Lodge
patients who Self-Harm.
METHODOLOGY
The study is influenced by aspects of various methodologies, including those based on grounded theory and on feminist and related theories. These approaches are particularly concerned, both with the expression of respondents' views, and the reduction of sources of bias caused by imbalances of power between respondent and research (4,5,6,7)
Our research method is semi-structured interviewing, including open-ended questions to
enable patients to talk about issues of importance to them. At the time of writing, nine
interviews (commenced in December, 1996) have been completed.
ETHICAL CONCERNS
The study commenced only after discussion with staff and patients, and local Ethics
Committee approval. Ethical concerns have included consideration of whether interviews
would be likely to cause patients distress (although) previous researchers have reported
an absence of problems in this area (8). So far, this problem appears to have
been overcome by enabling patients to make an informed decision about whether or not to
take part, making it clear that interviews can be concluded at any time; and by our
ongoing awareness of whether or not participants are distressed by the interviews.
POWER ISSUES
Patients who take part are assured of confidentiality, except that we explain that, to
ensure safety, we will inform a staff member of any expressed plans to harm self or
others. In addition, there are other power imbalances between ourselves and respondents,
despite our efforts to be approachable and informal. In particular, one of us (RB) works
for Arnold Lodge, and is, of course, "part of the System". This is likely to
affect interview responses, although it seems difficult to assess to what extent, and in
what ways.
DATA ANALYSIS
Data analysis will be concerned largely with the identification of particular themes:
mainly topics mentioned by relatively large numbers of respondents. These themes may be
used as a basis for further research in this area (7).
DEFINITIONS OF "SELF-HARM"
One initial finding is that, in general, patients include a very wide range of
behaviours in their definitions and descriptions of "self-harm". Besides cutting
and overdoses, various individuals have referred to: unwanted tattoos, taking various
substances, heavy drinking and behaving in ways which resulted in others' rejection. One
individual said:
Richard Byrt, Research Nurse
Judy Reece, Senior Lecturer, Mental Health Nursing
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We have very much appreciated the help of colleagues: and in particular, the keenness
of many patients to take part, and their often thoughtful and detailed views. Further
details of this research project are available from us.
Richard Byrt, Research Nurse, East Midlands Centre for Forensic Mental Health, Arnold
Lodge, LEICESTER, LE5 0LE Tel: 0116 246 1262 Ext 2831
Judy Reece, Senior Lecturer, Mental Health Nursing, Dept. of Nursing and Midwifery,
Scraptoft Campus, De Montfort University, LEICESTER LE7 9SU
REFERENCES
1. BURROW, S. (1992) "The Deliberate Self-harming Behaviour of Patients within a
British Special Hospital." Journal of Advanced Nursing Vol.17 pp 138-148
2. HEALTH ADVISORY SERVICE (1994) Suicide Prevention. The Challenge Confronted. London:
HMSO.
3. LIEBLING, A. (1993) Suicide in Prison. London: Routledge.
4. LAYDER, D. (1993) New Strategies in Social Research. Cambridge: Policy Press
5. SIGSWORTH, J. (1995) "Feminist Research: Its Relevance to Nursing" Journal
of Advanced Nursing Vol.22 No.5, pp 896-899
6. STANLEY, L. (Ed.) (1990) Feminist Praxis. London: Routledge.
7. STRAUSS, A. and CORBIN, J. (1990) Basics of Qualitative Research., Grounded Theory
Procedures and Techniques. Newbury Park: Sage.
8. POTIER, M.A. (1993) "Giving Evidence: Women's Lives in Ashworth Maximum
Security Special Hospital." Feminism and Psychology Vol.3, No.3 pp 335-347
DEVELOPING THE PRACTICE OF RISK ASSESSMENT THE
EXPERIENCE OF ONE R.S.U.
BACKGROUND
Recent years have seen an increase in the interest of the concepts of Risk Assessment
and Risk Management of Dangerousness. Much information is available on the assessment of
risk associated with certain behaviours (Monahan, 1988. Monahan and Steadman 1994. Pollock
and Webster, 1990). Related to this, McMurran (1996) refers to the concept of
"managing risk through treatment" in relation to the needs of personality
disordered offenders.
However, little information is available on the practice of Risk Assessment and management of dangerousness for nurses working within Forensic Mental Health settings. The most notable exception being the Behavioural Status Index Manual used at Rampton (Reed Robinson and Woods, 1996).
It is believed within the East Midlands Centre for Forensic Mental health that before we can address and develop the specifics of Risk Assessment, we need to ensure that the basic concept of Risk Assessment of Dangerousness is developed as an integral part of practice.
In Arnold Lodge, this area of practice development is addressed through a system of
Clinical Audit of the two Risk Assessment instruments currently in use. Changes in
practice and training occur as a result of this.
COMPREHENSIVE RISK ASSESSMENT
The Comprehensive Risk Assessment is a ten category assessment of the individual and
contextual factors surrounding the person's offence behaviour. Its origins are to be found
in much of the recognised work on the Clinical Assessment of Dangerousness (Pollock and
Webster, 1990. Monahan and Steadman, 1994) and encompass the questions outlines in the
Home Office 14-item questionnaire (HMSO 1990). It is by no means a sophisticated model
but, it addresses two
fundamental issues. Firstly, in its simplicity, it provides a basis for the assessment of
risk as an integral part of practice. Secondly, it segregates dangerousness into its
component parts, as suggested by Robinson (1996), Steadman et al (1994).
WEEKLY RISK ASSESSMENT
The Weekly Risk Assessment on the other hand, attempts to identify the different
components from the Comprehensive Risk Assessment and uses these in defining the day-to-day
management of patients. It also provides a structure by which information on the
risk factors is gathered and added to the Comprehensive Risk Assessment as well as
identifying areas for Risk Management through treatment. It is an eight category
instrument which is completed by the named nurse in time for each Weekly Clinical Meeting.
From this, decisions on high risk activities are made.
Both instruments contribute to positive decision making by encouraging a
non-restrictive approach to the Risk Management of patients. This is done by identifying
factors which constitute a risk in particular situations as well as identifying those
factors which will minimise the opportunity for this to happen. E.g. gender
considerations, times of the day and opportunities for substance abuse.
STANDARDS AND CLINICAL AUDIT
To monitor and develop the practice of Risk Assessment in each of the ward areas, Risk
Assessment Co-ordinators were appointed with the responsibility of encouraging and
explaining the use of the Risk Assessment models. However, overall development was
co-ordinated by the author. Regular meetings were held with this group and as result,
Standards on the use of the models were finalized in June 1996. The Comprehensive Risk
Assessment was to be completed in time for the first Clinical Review and every three
months thereafter and the Weekly Risk Assessment needed to be completed each week in time
for the Ward rounds/Clinical Meeting.
The Standards were then to be used as the criteria for the Clinical Audit of Risk
Assessment at Arnold Lodge.
Using the Clinical Audit Cycle as outlined by the NHS Management Executive (NHS.E 1996)
as the structure, the Standards were modified on two occasions at the Risk Assessment
Co-ordinator meetings, after feedback from various disciplines.
RESULTS
Since this time (six months), a systematic Clinical Audit of the use of the Risk
Assessment instruments has been carried out at four-weekly intervals. Whilst it is
accepted that the instruments are at a very basic stage, it does appear that Risk
Assessment is gradually being integrated into practice. (However the Audit's focus is on
quantitative data and little attention is paid to the quality of information).
The Comprehensive risk Assessment has increased from 46% (August 1996) to 70% completed
overall throughout the Unit, with one ward area functioning at 100% usage.
The Weekly Risk Assessment instrument has seen its use increase from 35% to 56% over
the same period.
FUTURE STRATEGY
Current plans are to develop the practice of Risk Assessment by focusing attention on the quality of the information received. This may include research surrounding the use of tools already developed in this area. (Robinson, 1996. Webster, 1995). Anyone is welcome to contact me to discuss this project or for further references.
Tony McGranaghan, Education and Quality Department, East Midlands Centre for Forensic
Mental Health, Arnold Lodge, Leicester
REFERENCES
HMSO (1990) Home Office Guideline Questionnaire: Risk Assessment.
MONAHAN, J. (1988) Risk Assessment of Violence among the Mentally Disordered:
Generating useful knowledge. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 11:
249-257
MONAHAN, J & STEADMAN, H. (1983) Crime and Mental Disorder: An epidemiological
approach. In Toury M., and Morris N (Eds.) Crime & Justice: An annual review of
research 145-189 Chicago: University of Chicago Press
MONAHAN, H & STEADMAN, H. (Eds.) (1994) Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments
in Risk Assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
McMURRAN, M. (1996) Managing criminal risk through treatment. Psychiatric Care
Vol.3 No.2. pp 51-55.
NHS Executive (1996) Promoting Clinical Effectiveness: A framework for action through
the NHS Leeds: NHS Executive.,
POLLOCK, N., WEBSTER, C. (1990) The clinical assessment of dangerousness. In Bluglass,
R., Bowden, P. (Eds) Principles & Practice of Forensic Psychiatry. pp 489-497
Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone.
REED, V., ROBINSON, D. and WOODS, P. (1996) Behavioural Status Index: Named Nurse
Assessment Manual for the Assessment of Dangerousness and Risk. Retford: Rampton Hospital
ROBINSON,D. (1996) Developing Risk Assessment Scales in Forensic Psychiatric Care. In Psychiatric
Care Vol.3 No.4
STEADMAN, H., MONAHAN, J., APPLEBAUM, P., GRISSO, T., MULVEY, E., ROTH, L., ROBBINS,S
P., KIASSEN, D. (1994) Designing a new generation of risk assessment research In. MONAHAN,
J., STEADMAN, H., (Eds.) (1994) Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments ins Risk
Assessment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
WEBSTER, C., EAVES, D. (1995) The HCR-20 Scheme: The Assessment of Dangerousness and Risk. British Columbia: Simon Fraser University and Forensic Psychiatric Commission of British Columbia.
DEVELOPING RISK ASSESSMENT IN FORENSIC SERVICES
This article describes a current research project being undertaken in the forensic
setting into the assessment of risk. An assessment instrument is being developed with the
intention of establishing a systematic baseline for risk behaviours which will provide
individual patient data for use in treatment planning. It is anticipated that this
information will assist in determining precise treatment goals and provide documentation
for use in monitoring health outcomes.
The assessment under development is the Behavioural Status Index (BSI), a seventy item
assessment which is being used by nurses and psychosocial day services staff within
Rampton Hospital Authority. Each of the seventy items consists of a five point scale
ranging from worst, to best, possible scenarios.
As Robinson et al (1996) has pointed out, there is a shortage of behaviourally based
instruments with which to carry out reliable therapeutic assessments. Monahan (1988),
identified the need for behavioural assessment instruments which could form the basis of
treatment planning. The BSI attempts to detail patient behaviour which is indicative of
risk, and which can then be used by clinical teams as the basis for decision making and
related treatment interventions. As Monahan and Steadman et al (1994) report:
dangerousness should be desegregated into component parts of `risk factors', `harm' and
`risk level'. Monahan (1996) explains that account should be taken of the variables to
predict violence, the amount and type of violence being predicted, and the likelihood that
harm will occur.
The BSI consists of three sub-scales, two of which were developed by Mahgoub and Reed
(1988) and the third by Dr. Robinson and named nurses from four clinical areas at Rampton
Hospital Authority. The main components of the Risk sub-scale relate to a variety of
aggressive behaviours, self-harm, and inappropriate sexual behaviours. The Insight
sub-scale relates to items such as tension-producing thoughts, attributing dislike in
others, and events producing feelings of insecurity. The Communication and Social Skills
sub-scale includes items on eye contact, egocentric conversation, assertion, and
relationships with others.
The terms `usually', `frequently', `occasionally', and `rarely', are used throughout in
the five point scales. Because these terms are generally open to interpretation, a
glossary of terminology is provided, thus enabling the assessor to identify quite precise
frequencies of behaviour. The issue of frequent daily problem behaviour eventually
becoming accepted by nurses as the norm for a patient, and therefore no longer recorded,
was identified by a named nurse. She devised a Critical Incident Form (CIR) based on items
in the Risk sub-scale which allowed nurses to record frequent problem behaviour quickly.
This information could then be regularly summarised by the named nurse. This CIR was
adopted for the purpose of this research project and circulated to all wards with the
intention of re-focussing nursing attention on recording unacceptable behaviour. It is
anticipated that this procedure will assist in using the BSI.
After two trials, the BSI is now being used by every named nurse in Rampton Hospital as
part of an ongoing detailed study. In addition, there are a number of collaborating sites
with which comparisons of scores can be made in medium and low secure, mainstream
psychiatric and community settings. The study data collection will finish towards the end
of 1997 at which time the instrument will be revised using information from statistical
tests relating to the validity of each item, and from feedback from users.
Author:
Stuart Henderson, Clinical Nurse Specialist, Rampton Hospital, Retford, Notts, DN22 0PD
Tel: 01777 247424
REFERENCES:
Mahgoub, N A and Reed, V (1988): `Bridging' Therapy in Hospital and Community Based
Psychiatric Nursing Care: A Comparative Study (two volumes). Unpublished PhD thesis,
Council for National Academic Awards (sponsoring establishment, Sheffield City
Polytechnic.
Monahan, J (1988): Risk assessment of violence among the mentally disordered:
generating useful knowledge. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 11 249-257.
Monahan, J (1996): Violence Prediction: The Past Twenty and the Next Twenty Years.
Criminal Justice and Behaviour, Vol.23, No.1, pp 107-120.
Robinson, D, Reed, V and Lange A. (1996): Developing risk assessment scales in forensic
psychiatric care. Psychiatric Care, Vol.3, No.4, pp 146-152.
Steadman, H.J., Monahan, J., Appelbaum, P.S., Grisso T., Mulvey, EP, Roth, L.H.,
Robbins, P.C. and Klassen, D. (1994): Designing a new generation of risk assessment
research. In Monahan, J and Steadman, H J (eds) Violence and Mental Disorder: Developments
in Risk Assessment. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
PATIENT SELF-REPORT IN RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk assessment particularly in deciding a patients level of dangerousness is becoming
a national topical issue (Vinestock, 1996)1. Therefore the need to develop and
use accurate measures of risk assessment is essential. Patient self perception is one part
of risk assessment and this abstract describes the use of a patient self-rating inventory.
The original Buss-Durkee Hostility Inventory (BDHI) (Buss and Durkee 1957)2
was formerly a widely used patient self-report questionnaire on aggression. Three Dutch
studies (Lange et al., 1995 a,b,c)3 developed the inventory within a detailed
investigation. Here they found three factorial clusters consisting of forty items. The
three factors were: Overt aggression (16 items measuring the tendency to express verbal or
physical aggression); Covert aggression (19 items, dealing with repressed aggression).
Additionally five items relating to Social Desirability, these indicate that respondents
who tend to give socially desirable answers are less inclined to report aggressive
behaviour. The Dutch experience revealed high predictive ability for the inventory.
The BDHI-D has been translated into English (Robinson et al, 1996)4. This
version has been in use for a period of eight months. Data collection is taking place at
Rampton Hospital Authority (catering for mentally disordered offenders under conditions of
maximum security) and various other secure and non-secure psychiatric establishments
nationally, and the normal population to establish English norm data. Patients are
assessed as near to admission as possible. The inventory takes approximately 15 minutes to
complete and analysis takes just a couple of minutes. Results are then fed-back to named
nurses and compared with patient records to give an indication of accuracy. Data
collection is progressing with a sample of 50 new admissions and data collection beginning
on the resident Rampton population.
To date patients who have demonstrated high levels of both Covert and Overt aggression, but scored low on these scales after completing the inventory have tended to score highly on the Social Desirability scale - a testament so far to the reliability. Patients who have scored high on Overt Aggression and Covert Aggression tend to have low Social Desirability scores. Scoring for overt and covert aggression are analysed into very low, low, average, high and very high categories. This enables norm scores to be established for different populations. Although data is preliminary the high security forensic population shows some marked differences to all the other norm scores in respect of overt and covert aggression. Indications are a higher level of aggression in this population in comparison to others. The social desirability ranges however remain almost identical in every population. Although the forensic psychiatric population is still relatively small it has shown some interesting results. Considerable demographic data is collected which includes age and legal status. this enables comparative analysis of a number of different parameters.
For example:
As a predictor: Admission assessments provide a baseline, and this could provide clinicians with a useful insight into the levels of aggression to expect from the patient.
Planning of treatment, targeting: Indications of high levels of aggression allow for the planning of treatment regimes and resource allocation. Interventions could be targeted leading to very specific care planning. For example: an inventory may show that a particular patient will always respond aggressively when challenged, alternative communication strategies could be explored with the patient to reduce the likelihood of such behaviour.
Monitoring of outcome: Subsequent re-running of the inventory after care
delivery will offer an indication of success. Preliminary data collected in the
pre-discharge area of the hospital indicate lower scoring patterns which is what would be
expected.
In conclusion the B.D.H.I.-D. Shows promise as one element of a specific risk
assessment and treatment planning strategy in psychiatric care, particularly in relation
to the measurement of covert hospitality. This phenomenon is difficult to measure from an
objective clinical viewpoint because of its covert nature. Measurements of this kind are
usually based on `psychiatric hunches' or experience, and any instrument that can go some
way towards validating such feelings must be useful. Data is accumulating constantly, and
as results come in from external sites valuable analysis can be performed to give
normative data which will be of use to all psychiatric practitioners.
Authors:
Mick Collins, Nurse Researcher and Dr David Robinson, Senior Nurse Research and
Development, Rampton Hospital, Retford, Notts, DN22 0PD. Tel. 01777 247241
REFERENCES
1. Vinestock, M. (1996): Risk Assessment: "A Word to the Wise?" Advances in
Psychiatric Treatment, Vol.2, pp 3-10.
2. Buss, A.H. and Durkee, A. (1957): An Inventory for Assessing Different Kinds of
Hostility. Journal of Consulting Psychology, Vol.21, pp 165-174.
3. Lange, A, Dehghani, B., DeBeurs, E. (1995a): Validation of the Dutch Adaptation of
the Buss-Dark Hostility Inventory. Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol.33 No.2, 229-233.
Lange, A, Pahlich, A., Sarucco, M., Smits, G., Dehghani, B., and Hanewald, G. (1995b):
Psychometric characteristics and validity of the Dutch adaptation of the Buss-Dark
Hostility Inventory (the BDHI-D). Behaviour Research and Therapy, Vol.33, No.2, pp
223-227.
Lange, A., Hoogendoorn, M., Wiederspahn, A., and De Beurs, E. (1995c): Buss-Dark Hostility
Inventory Manual; Handleiding, Verantwoodrding en Normering van de Nederlandse Buss-Dark
Agressie Vragenligst (Buss-Durkee Hostility; Construction, Psychometric Properties,
Validity and Norms of the Dutch Buss-Dark Hostility Inventory). Swets and Zeitlinger,
Lisse.
4. Robinson, D., Reed, V and Lange, A. (1996): Developing Risk Assessment Scales in
Forensic Psychiatric Care. Psychiatric Care, Vol.3 No.4 pp 146-152
CURRENT DEVELOPMENTS IN THE STATE HOSPITAL CARSTAIRS
1. The Development of a Service for Women and Minority Groups
The combination of flexible therapeutically balanced patient centred care within a
setting of special security, in which women are detained, due to what is seen as
`anti-social and violent behaviours' of females represented a challenging dilemma about
finding an approach that would not only record and accept, but treat the violent
behaviours.
In addition to the group of women who currently receive a service that is
gender-neutral, there is also a small proportion of males who are either of an ethnic or
disabled minority. In all, these groups presently account for approximately only 10% of
the population, and invariably have not received a specific needs-led service that is
sensitive to social differences.
The project aims to introduce a broader range of therapeutic strategies in the care and
treatment of these women. It involves skills training and clinical supervision of all
staff, which will be led by a Clinical Nurse Specialist based on the ward, and the
therapeutic milieu of the unit will be monitored using the Moos Atmosphere Scale. (Moos
1974) The development of appropriate policies and protocols is also ongoing.
2. Clinical Supervision
Funding has been sought from the N.B.S. for a study which will examine the perceptions
of staff receiving supervision. This will be a comparative study as there are currently
two models of the supervision process in place in the hospital. The study will explore the
issues which arise from the relationship between the supervisor and the supervisee, e.g.
the nature of the relationship, the establishment of ground rules, the process of
supervision and the perceived benefits to each. It is hoped that the study will contribute
to the development of best practice by addressing the local and particular needs of
nurses, educators and managers in the Special Hospital setting.
3. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Initiative
To initiate a new approach to caring for patients with the diagnosis of personality
disorder is a major task. it is not only a question of education, knowledge and skill, but
a issue grounded in the attitudes and beliefs of nursing staff about the likelihood of
achieving any progress with this difficult client group. The approach, Cognitive
Behavioural Therapy is not difficult given the expertise of the therapist and the
commitment to teaching this approach using experiential teaching/learning strategies. This
is a multi-disciplinary study, using an experimental design to measure the therapeutic
milieu in four wards which treat patients diagnosed as personality disordered and those
with enduring mental illness. Two wards have patients undertaking C.B.T. approaches and
two wards will act as a control. The study will be of 18 months duration.
Mrs. Carol Watson, Carstairs, The State Hospital, Lanark, Scotland.
RESEARCH PROJECTS WITHIN THE HUTTON CENTRE (MSU)
1. "The Relationship between a Medium Secure
Environment and Occupational Stress in Forensic Psychiatric Nurses"
Investigators:
Stephen D.Kirby and Phillip H.Pollock
Resumé
By using a package of approved empirical psychological assessment tools plus a home
made demographic questionnaire all the ward based nursing staff within the Hutton Unit
were surveyed to determine their perceptions of their levels of Occupational Stress and
how that correlates with their perceptions of their ward atmosphere. The investigators'
hypothesis was disproved due to the very favourable results.
Current Status:
Completed - Was published in the November 1995 issue of the Journal of Advanced Nursing
and has been presented at numerous local. National and international conferences.
2. "A Study of Ward Atmosphere on a Medium Secure
Long-Stay Ward"
Investigator:
Stephen D. Kirby
Resumé
By using a package of approved empirical psychological assessment tools (Ward
Atmosphere Scale) of the patient and nursing groups of the medium secure long stay ward.
Similar responses were taken from patients and staff of the service pre-discharge ward for
comparison, both patient groups being deemed to be `long stay'. Both ward areas are based
within the Hutton Centre. These groups were surveyed to determine their perceptions of
their levels of their current wards and gain a baseline picture of the therapeutic nature
of the long stay ward. The investigators' hypothesis was disproved due to the very
favourable results.
Current Status:
Study completed, presentation made to Forensic Service staff and manuscript has been
submitted for publication
3. "A Comparative Study of Admission Rates between two
Regional Secure Units.
Investigators:
Lawrence Naismith; Chris Green; Stephen D.Kirby and Katrina Moss.
Resumé
Taking the admission figures from both the Hutton Unit and the Norvic Clinic in Norwich
and subjecting them to various variables, such as diagnosis; section of the M.H.A.; length
of stay; criminal record (if any). Then doing a straight forward comparison of the
figures.
Current Status:
All data has been collected and processed and is currently awaiting to put into
document form.
4. "Malingering and Feigned Illness within Forensic
Psychiatric Patients and the nursing approach to such patients."
Investigators:
Forensic Research Interest Group
Resumé
Looking at the statistical figures of patients who are currently inpatients of the
Hutton Unit and those who have been referred and, by using an empirical psychological
tool, determining those who are feigning or exaggerating mental illness. From this then to
move on to look at possible nursing interventions of such people.
Current Status
Completed - Has been accepted for publication by the Journal of Psychiatric and Mental
Health Nursing.
5. "Development of a Multi-Disciplinary Risk Assessment
Tool"
Investigator:
Stephen D Kirby
Resumé
This project is intending to look at developing a tool which will/can be used in the
assessment of risk through all areas of the patients stay within the Forensic Service.
This obviously has wider usage in the field of Adult Mental Health as a whole.
Current Status
A grant from the R & D Committee has been awarded to fund an associate
investigator. To commence shortly.
6. "Satisfaction of Forensic Service Users"
Investigators:
Nigel Maguire, Lawrence Naismith and Stephen D.Kirby
Resumé
To canvas the opinions of patients; staff; relatives/visitors and service purchasers of
the Forensic Service to determine their satisfaction levels of the service we deliver.
Current Status:
Questionnaires have been distributed; returned but due to the poor response rate the
project was not viable - is currently being examined to implement it again in the near
future.
7. "A Study of Sentenced Prisoners Transferred to
Hospitals"
Investigators:
Chris Green & Lawrence Naismith
Resumé
By taking statistical figures from in-house: the Home Office and other sources to
determine if there has been an increase in these transfers or not.
Current Status:
Information gathering in progress.
8. "Profiling and Assessment of Paedophiles"
Investigators:
Stephen D.Kirby; Phillip Pollock and Claire Thompson
Resumé
By taking an existing study and expanding upon it and providing more empirical
validation it is hoped to develop an assessment tool for use in profiling and assessing
paedophilic offenders.
Current Status:
Initial work of acquiring and developing assessment tools is almost complete, a pool of
subjects has been drawn up. Interview work hoping to commence shortly. Elements of this
project will form the dissertation phase of one of the investigators' M.Sc. Course.
9. "Looking at the Functions; Role Within and Climate of
the Multi-Disciplinary Team within the Regional Secure Unit"
Investigator:
Stephen D. Kirby
Resumé:
By utilising an existing empirical psychological tool and canvasing the opinions of ALL
members of the Multi-Disciplinary Team (i.e. everybody who works on the Hutton Unit) it is
hope to determine peoples impressions of their roles within the M.D.T. and how they differ
from other people's roles and impressions of team functioning. The tool offers suggestions
for rectifying a dysfunctional team. It is intended that this will follow on from the
Occupational Stress study and support (or not) those findings.
Current Status:
Tool just acquired preparations under way for a fairly imminent start.
10. "Patient Satisfaction within a Medium Secure Long
Stay Ward (provisional)"
Investigators:
Ian Tregay and Stephen D.Kirby (Supervisor)
Resumé
To follow up the Ward Atmosphere Study of patients within a medium secure Long-Stay ward this study aims to elicit their degrees of satisfaction of their current environment.
Current Status:
Project is still in the planning stage; tool being formulated and ethical approval
being sought.
11. "Psychiatric Health Care Provision within a Local
Prison Cluster"
Investigators:
Stephen D.Kirby and Nigel Maguire
Resumé
A descriptive study of the `Prison Health Care Contract' was carried out, looking at
the numbers and types of referrals made to the Prison Health Care staff. This has
implications on the future service that is provided to the `Durham Prison Cluster' by
highlighting trends in types of referrals and the amount of input that is required by the
different disciplines involved within this contract.
Current Status:
Study completed, report completed and is currently being `proof read' prior to
submission to Prison Headquarters before submission for publication.
There are numerous small discussion and descriptive papers being written and put
forward for publication.
The list will be updated at regular intervals.
Stephen D.Kirby, Research and Practice Development Nurse, August 1996
Cycles of Abuse Intergenerational Transmission of Abuse
AIMS OF STUDY
This research examines approaches that may contribute to the identification and
quantification of physical and/or sexual abuse suffered by in-patient population of
Regional Secure Units. This study specifically examines possible links between
physical/sexual abuse suffered by an in-patient population of mentally disordered
offenders in childhood or adolescence and the prevalence of violent or aggressive
offending in this group in later life.
RATIONALE
The study interest is in, what may be termed as a cycle of abuse theory of violent offending which stems from experiences of working as a staff nurse, charge nurse, and clinical nurse advisor in a Birmingham Regional Secure Unit, Reaside Clinic. Here, regular evidence of abuse, both sexual and physical in the childhood and adolescent careers of violent offenders referred to the medium secure unit is noted. As a consequence of work in this area at the clinic I was drawn to further examination of how to define the physical/sexual abuse suffered by the in-patient group, as well as quantification of this abuse. In previous examinations it was clear that the quantification or measurement of severity of physical/sexual abuse suffered by violent offenders was compounded by definitional problems. This observation is complemented by Hamilton (1987), who has indicated that:
In examining specific mental disorders suffered by the physically/sexually abused in
patient population of violent offenders a ranking and classification system was designed
related to the severity of abuse suffered. As a consequence, I am in a position to examine
links between the two. Further examination involved the validity of using an overall mean
score obtained from three decision makers, examining the severity of physical sexual abuse
suffered by the group. Findings from score values obtained from three decision makers
(health professionals) and their scores, made subject to correlation determinations, have
resulted in the validation of the use of an overall mean score to measure severity of
abuse suffered by each patient.
An extension of this previously completed work (November 1995) to other forensic areas,
(Medium Secure Services) has occurred. Contacts have been established in other secure
units extending both the sample size and consequently this study. The value in examining
whether the samples are representative of forensic services overall is clear. In studies
undertaken by Spatz Widom (1989), in the area of intergenerational transmission of
violence she has concluded that case histories of small samples have minimal statistical
usefulness, and the extension of work in this area to the services indicated would appear
to be an opportunity to overcome this problem. The work completed to date cannot be said
to be representative of mentally disordered offenders in England, or of a violent group of
offender in-patients in England, therefore the extension of this work to all of the medium
secure units in the UK will be of clear value in examining a cycle of violence in violent
offenders who have been physically or sexually abused during childhood and adolescence.
The value of further examining multidisciplinary decision making with respect to
quantifying such abuse is also clear. Both Browne (1988) and Browne and Herbert (1995)
point to the usefulness and importance of work in this area.
PROPOSAL
The research proposal will involve two studies; the first study will detail the
prevalence of sexual/physical abuse suffered in childhood and/or adolescence by violent
offenders within the chosen regional secure units further examining characteristics of
this group such as ethnicity, diagnosis and gender. The second study will examine the
severity and quantification of the abuse suffered, examining in detail the definitional
problems associated with abuse, physical and sexual, suffered by this client group.
The second area of the work then will be a ratification of what constitutes abuse in
this group, and there will be a subsequent attempt to quantify the abuse suffered, by
examining score values obtained from health professionals. This will be undertaken subject
to correlation determinations, in turn examining the validity of mean scores in this area.
The proposed research involves ethical approval from various regional secure units or
relevant health authorities, and a prolonged period of data collection and case analysis.
This process would be followed by an assessment of findings following evaluation of data.
IMPLICATIONS
There is potential in that such work could significantly influence the design of
interventions for those who are abused in childhood or adolescence, and in turn possibly
have an effect on service provision. The implications for training and educational
provision in youth treatment centres, and amongst clinicians working in forensic practice
could also be influenced by such research.
Mr. Norman McClelland, Lecturer in Forensic Psychiatric Nursing, University
of Birmingham / Reaside Clinic
REFERENCES
1. Browne, K., Davies, C. and Stratton P. (1988) Early Prediction & Prevention of
Child Abuse Chichester: John Wiley & Sons
2. Hamilton, John R. (1987) Violence and its Victims. The Contribution of Victimology to Forensic Psychiatry. The Lancet January 17 Pages 147-150
3. Widom, Cathy Spatz (1989) Does Violence beget Violence? A critical examination of
the literature Psychological Bulletin Vol. 106 No.1 Pages 3-28
4. Widom, Cathy Spatz (1989) The Cycle of Violence Science 244 Pages 160-166 April
Dr David Robinson
Senior Nurse Research and Development
Rampton Hospital
RETFORD
Notts
DN22 0PD
Tel: 01777 247245
Fax: 01777 247221
E-Mail: Drobin@Rampton_Hospital.BtInternet.com
Graham Durcan
Senior Researcher
The Sainsbury Centre for Mental health
134-138 Borough High Street
LONDON
SE1 1LB
Tel: 0171 403 8790
Fax: 0171 403 9482
E-Mail: graham_durcan@scmh.ccmail.compuserve.com
Dr Tom Mason
Lecturer in Forensic Psychiatric Nursing
Ashworth Hospital
Parkbourn
Maghull
Merseyside
Tel: 0151 473 0303
Fax: 0151 471 2329
Callum McDonald
Health Care Staff Development Officer
Staff Training Unit
HMP Maghaberry
Old Road
Upper Ballinderry
Lisburn
County Antrim
Northern Ireland
Tel: 01846 611888
Fax: 01846 619516
David Sallah
Researcher
Public Sector Management Unit
Aston Business School
BIRMINGHAM
B4 7ET
Tel: 0121 359 3611 (Ext 4605
Fax: 0121 359 1148
E-Mail: dk_sallah@msn.com
Norman McClelland
Lecturer in Forensic Psychiatric Nursing
Reaside Clinic
Birmingham Great Park
Bristol Road South
Birmingham
B45 9BE
Tel: 0121 453 6161
Fax: 0121 453 7181
Carol Watson
Senior Nurse Practice Development
The State Hospital
Carstairs
Lanark
ML11 8RP
Tel: 01555 840293
Fax:01555 840024
Andrew McGleish
Ward Manager
Caswell Clinic
Glanrhyd Hospital
Bridgend
Mid Glamorgan
Wales CF31 4LN
Tel: 01656 662179
Fax: 01656 662157
E-Mail: amcgleish@netscape.net
Margaret Swanson
Care UK Mental Health Services
Whitewold
13 Mere Lane
Heswall
Wirral
Tel: 0151 342 9664
Mary Gove
SNM for Specialisms
MH Services
Divisional Research Unit
Royal Cornhill Hospital
Aberdeen
AB9 2ZH
Tel: 01224 663131 (Ext. 57443)
Fax: 01224 646201
Steve Kirby
Research & Practice Development Nurse
c/o The Academic Centre
St. Lukes Hospital
Marton Road
Middlesbrough
Cleveland TS4 3AF
Tel: 01642 850850 (Ext.2120)
Dr Greta Mathews
Research & Development Project Manager
High Security Psychiatric Services
Commissioning Board
Department of Health
40 Eastbourne Terrace
LONDON
W2 3QR
Tel: 0171 725 5536
Fax: 0171 258 0530
Richard Byrt
Research Nurse
c/o Arnold Lodge RSU
Cordelia Close
LEICESTER
LE5 0LE
Tel: 0116 246 1262
Fax: 0116 246 0379
Bridget Bower
Secretary
Research and Development Dept
Rampton Hospital
Retford
Notts
DN22 0PD
Tel: 01777 247242
Fax: 01777 247221
Link to Forensic Nursing Resource Homepage
© This page was designed by Phil Woods and is copyright of the author